Good cimplications. As you say it is a ’False God’ The difference in particular is that the artist is a living, organic intelligence that is ”channeling ” inspired content from life experience and by implication from the source of the soul, life itself. Viewing it we experience a ’mutualism ” of the experince of one living being to another. I do think AI may produce something that is affects us as beauty or calming or interesting but there will not be the connection from the organic source
1 years ago
Oops typo . I meant goid conversation not complications :)
1 years ago
Good cimplications. As you say it is a ’False God’ The difference in particular is that the artist is a living, organic intelligence that is ”channeling ” inspired content from life experience and by implication from the source of the soul, life itself. Viewing it we experience a ’mutualism ” of the experince of one living being to another. I do think AI may produce something that is affects us as beauty or calming or interesting but there will not be the connection from the organic source